When Donald Trump suggested that some of the family members of the San Bernadino terrorists must’ve known or at least suspected that there was something going on, the media excoriated him. Speaking, as they presume to do, for the rest of us, the the media proclaimed “this is not who we are.”
Who knew that we are a people who even refuse to investigate any possible leads or connections that would show who knew what and when about a terrorist attack on US soil. Maybe that’s who the media is, but we the American people demand that no stone remain unturned to get to the truth and that whomever is responsible be brought to justice. Unfortunately, the US Government seems to be on the side of the media and desperately tries to cover up any evidence that members of the Farook family knew about the planned attack.
The good thing is that while the government tools and bureaucrats are kneeling at the feet of internationalists, the private sector is motivated – as it should be- by profits, and thus has no need to subscribe to Oabam’s cover-up. The Minnesota Life Insurance company filed a lawsuit alleging that mama Farook knew about the planned terrorist attacks and said nothing to anyone. Not only that, but the company names, as it has to, the US government as a co-defendant.
“Minnesota Life is informed and believes that Ms. Farook had material knowledge of, and/or participated in, the planning of the terrorist attack executed by the insured,” according to the six-page lawsuit, which names Rafia Farook, Saira Khan, who is Syed Farook’s sister, and the U.S. government as defendants.”
So while the FBI and the rest of the government alphabet soup of organizations, are falling all over themselves to convince us that the terrorists were able to stash pipe-bombs and bomb making equipment and thousands of rounds of ammunition in their garage without anyone noticing anything, the Minnesota Life Insurance Company preferred to use common sense and investigate further.
“Minnesota Life is therefore uncertain as to whether it is obligated to pay a death benefit to a beneficiary who had material knowledge of, and/or participated in, the planning of the terrorist attack executed by the insured.”
This is where things get interesting, because if an impartial jury finds in favor of the Minnesota Life Insurance Company and rules they believe that mama Farook knew of the attack, then what of the FBI and the US Government? How can a backwater life insurance company have better investigators than the FBI? How can a backwater life insurance company be able to prove that the family of a terrorist had knowledge of a terrorist plot when the government could not? And the most important question of all is why hasn’t the Government moved heaven and earth to tie in the family of the terrorists with the terrorist act.