Yesterday the the list of  odd occurrences continued with Bill Clinton stepping forward to very publicly back former Colorado state House Speaker Andrew Romanoff. As you know  by now Mr. Romanoff is running to challenge Obama backed CO.  senator Michael  Bennet.

Dick Morris seems to think that these are the early moves in Hillary Clinton’s 2012 campaign. He may be right but I doubt it.  No I don’t doubt that Hillary wants the presidency,  what I doubt is  that she is willing to wait that long!

As far back as 2008 the left has been drooling over the prospect of a VP Hillary. Andy Ostry, Arriana Huffington , the Cleaveland  Leader have all said as much.   Recently the calls have intensified and even Washington Compost’s Sally Quinn proposed that Hillaty and Bidden should switch jobs.

As vice president Hillary would be  in an ideal position to  contend  for the  presidency and not as far away as 2012.
Here is a possible  scenario, suddenly documents that prove that Hussein Obama wasn’t born in US appear – lets not forget that the Clintons are very adept at making documents appear and disappear – and Hillary graciously accepts the Presidency.  There are many other possible scenarios  but this one is by far the most benign.

Among the alleged ( I haven’t read it)  comments that Gen  McChrystal makes in the interview are his statements that Obama was completely unprepared for their initial  meeting. Ha! We would’ve told him that a month before the meeting! The general doesn’t mention that Obama bee-bopped to the meeting but it’s not difficult to imagine him, Obama, doing that, just as he does when walking to mike to read the TOTUS.

Obama immediately summoned McChrystal to the White House to discuss the Rolling Stone interview.  Remember that it only took Obama three months to summon a meeting with McChrystal to discuss the need for additional troops. It’s good to see, once again, where Obama’s priorities lie.

Reports are that  Gen. McChrystal also told Rolling Stone magazine that he felt betrayed by Obama’s US ambassador to Afghanistan, Karl Eikenberry, and that he , McChrystal, also mocked VP Bidden -  We really don’t find the  latter to be news worthy after all who the hell doesn’t mock Bidden?

McChrystal is now on his apology tour and has been called to the White House . Well, we at Conunderground don’t feel all that sympathetic  to McChrystal. We feel the guy is in way over his head.  His lack of forceful criticism of the Obama’s administration’s refusal to allocate the necessary number of troops in Afghanistan has resulted in the June being on pace to be the deadliest month since the start of the war.

We also feel that McChrystal acceptance of the racist and criminally irresponsible rules of engagement imposed by Barrack Hussein Obama on American fighting men – the overwhelming majority of them white Christians – constituted, long ago, a complete and shameful surrender of the generals last shreds of honor or dignity for the sake of advancement and personal glory.

So far this month 41 Americans died and McChrystal can;t just blame Obama. Both of them are responsible and God willing will someday be tried for so cavalierly selling the lives of American fighting men down the drain.

If you think I’m too harsh on McChrystal, well, McChrystal voted for Obama and is thus directly responsible not just for the additional deaths in Afghanistan but like so many others is also responsible for inflicting the Obama plague on America.

General, you have a lot to make up for, so stand up and tell the truth about how Obama’s intention is not to win the war but to isolate and kill as many US troops as possible.  If you can’t do that  maybe take a hint from disgraced generals of the former  Roman and Japanese empires.  The blood of so many of our needlessly dead fighting men demands nothing less, in fact it demands a lot more.

Can you open a newspaper or magazine these days without seeing  headlines proclaiming  that there is some sort of anti incumbent wave sweeping Washington? No, you can’t ,  and  the same holds true for the state controlled television networks.

Lets get something clear right from the get go, this “anti incumbent‘ nonsense is just the media trying desperately to salvage a shred of credibility for Obama. In fact it’s not just Obama whose credibility is gone with the wind but also that of the MSM  for it was the media and Hollywood who brought the Obamanation upon us.

There is no anti incumbent wave in Washington. What it is is an anti liberal and anti Obama wave – and it’s building up into a tsunami!

How many candidates lost a primary or a seat to a less conservative opponent? Maybe you can point to the election  in upstate NY but that was a Chinese fire drill of an election wit three candidates representing four parties.

Here is what the media and Obama hopes you won’t find out:  the democrat who ran  against Obamacare won his primary ! That’s right, West Virginia’s Allen Mollohan the 14 term congressman ( I would be really ashamed if someone called me that) lost his seat to an upstart, State Senator Michale Olivero.  The main issue  that put Olivero over the top was his democrat opponent’s support for Obamacare!
That’s right folks! Democrats are running against Obamacare and winning primaries! If it wasn’t so sad it would be the pisser of the century!

In NJ Chris Christie spanked the democrat incumbent and former Goldman Sachs CEO Corzine like a red headed step child. Republicans won in VA and of course in MA.  How many of the winners campaigned on a liberal platform?

In Utah , a more conservative state thank God, once again the more conservative candidate won. He won  in spite of the neocon block, including  Mitt Romney and Gingrich desperately trying to save Bob Bennett’s campaign. There will be a republican primary in Utah and the more conservative candidate will win. As it should be.

So I ask again, how many conservative incumbents lost their seats to a more liberal challenger?

Here is the reality, regardless of how the vermin in the media try to spin that the sky is falling on incumbents,  there are plenty of incumbents who are sitting pretty tonight. There are plenty of incumbents   who fully and deservedly expect to be reelected. There is word for those, they are called “CONSERVATIVES !”

By Chris Olt

Many articles have been written to explain the  demonic hatred that the left has for Governor Sarah Palin. Many reasons have been enumerated  and most of them are valid.  Writers postulated that the left  hates her for being pretty and it’s true enough – she is very pretty and the left certainly hates that. ( I would add that she also seems to display very civilized hygiene and in certain leftist  circles that advocate wiping with one sheet that alone is reason for being burned at the stake.)

She has a tremendous career- not many women have had brighter – and  she achieved that without foregoing her obligations to her family, friends or faith. That also  is  an inexcusable sin perpetrated against the left’s established dogma.

In a sort of freakish  hedonistic martyrdom the liberal believes that all the evil that he/she causes will be, if not forgiven ,at least justified because in the end it will lead to a happier humanity..

She didn’t attend IV league schools and yet she wiped the debate floor with Joe Biden. And her achievements as governor of Alaska tower far above the demagoguery that the Columbia and Harvard attendee, Barack Hussein Obama, tried shamelessly to pass as his “community organizing” resume. Heck,  not only does the left have an ideological opposition to such an “aberration,” but quite frankly they also have very real personal financial objections. After all, Sarah is showing the world that student loans to rival a sizable mortgage are not required to rise to the highest levels of success.

Sarah chose to love and raise a baby diagnosed with Down’s syndrome, accepting God’s gift as was presented.  She also chose to support her unmarried pregnant daughter and help raise her grandson, a baby that Barrack Hussein Obama would consider a “punishment” if it were his daughters’ baby…his grandson.  Sarah Palin shone the light of God’s truth on the culture of death so cavalierly perpetrated by the left and of course for that, too, they hate her.

Sure , all of these, and many more are the reasons that the left goes into melt-down-mode at the mere mention of her name.  What many have not realized however,  is that Sarah Palin is a living breathing irrefutable rebuttal to the left’s most intimate,  most closely guarded and most deeply believed metaphysical dictum.

The leftists  look at Sarah Palin and  realize that the debauchery and sin that they so eagerly embrace is not just wrong, but worse than that, it’s simply not necessary.

This realization destroys the last possible excuse that any liberal with a modicum of conscience clings to in order to keep themselves from splattering their brains all over the headboard at 3:00 a.m.

The left certainly  knows that the ungodly leftist experiments have left behind Everest sized piles of dead bodies.  The left knows that it’s actions borne out of their dogmatic beliefs, have single- handedly  contributed to the overwhelming majority of the planet’s misery for at least the past 100 years.

Don’t get me wrong I fully understand that there are those like Obama. Soros, the Clintons, the Pelosis and the list goes on who believe not an iota of any of the left’s dogmas but simply see it as the fastest escalator to the highest echelons of power. I consider those just what they are, subhuman bacteria.

The majority of the left on the other hand, like the majority of us on  right, have not the  chance of a snow ball in hell to ever get that kind of power so their and our sustenance is our dogma and beliefs. For most of us on the right our faith in God is our deepest belief and its is the measuring stick against which we compare, if at times not as rigurously as we should, all of our actions and their consequences.   But what of the left what is that belief that is at heart of their essence? What exactly is it that, in the face so much historical evidence that they would be doing humanity a huge favor if they either stopped being libs or assume room temperature, keeps them going?

Well, its a very simple and idiotic, belief.  To go on living with the blood and misery that  are the result of leftist policies, liberals  hypnotically chant “the end justifies the means,”. In the end the world will be a happier place becasue of their actions. . Deep down in the putrid hallows of their souls that is the one small spark that keeps them going and they cling to that deception as  their last desperate refuge .

All the abortions, all the killing, the blasphemy, the murder, and misery that they cause, can, in the liberal mind, be excused by that statement.

In a sort of  hedonistic martyrdom the liberal believes that all the evil that he/she causes will be, if not  forgiven ,at least justified because in the end it will lead to a happier humanity.

Sarah Palin is a living  rebuttal to that nonsense. She is a living breathing embodiment of the happiness that can come form living the life of a normal Christian human being. She is the wrecking ball that demolishes the left’s last false barricade and, more importantly, she’s also a happy real life alternative to the putrefaction that is the left’s legacy. Like demons squirming and howling as holy water burns their flesh, the left will continue to hate  Sarah Palin because she denies them their only perceived refuge. And for that we will continue to love her and pray for her well-being and success.

Why expose the families and the victims-all America is a victim of this attack-  to the mockery and hatred that this human scum bag will spew at the trial? Why give him such a forum?

That alone is a reason to not bring him to trial but Obnama, well,  he doesn’t view it this way. Continuing to display the same callousness that he displayed in the wake of the most recent muslim terrorist attack at Ft Hood, Obama is most likely  reveling in the pain and suffering this will cause to  Christian America.  Obama thinks that we deserved the attacks, as per his apology tour and thinks that we deserve to be further humiliated by the upcoming circus.

The terrorists will be tried by a jury of their peers. I suppose Obama will have to instruct the Czars and his friends to show up for jury duty!

A coward and a weakling all his life, the viciousness that Obama  now displays is a trait he shares with others who grew up feeling powerless and outside of society. When such individuals attain a modicum of power they tend to strike back with a unmatched violence. If for example that sudden empowerment comes form the acquisition of a fire arm we end up with Columbine. If the empowerment takes the form of almost unlimited power such as the US Presidency….

In his typical cowardly fashion Obama ran off to Japan and only then, half a wold away, literally, Obama addressed the issue. No matter, we all know that he’s a cowardly pencil neck generally laughed at by all the world’s leaders. The question remains, why is Obama bringing Khalid Mohamed to New York?

The answer is multifaceted. Don’t for a second believe that he is bringing him to have a trial. That trial could take place anywhere just as efficiently so we have to understand that this is a calculated move on the part of Obama, Rahm Emanuel Axelrod, Soros and all the rest of the people who are hell bent upon enslaving you.

First of all he loves  rubbing our nose in the feces that is Kalid Muhammad and he’ll do it  because we allow him !

Second he is doing it to show the muslim terrorists and muslim states who sponsor terrorism that they have nothing to fear from the weakened Christians in America.

Third he  is bringing him here to set precedent and thus ensure that we can never again properly defend ourselves against these animals.

Fourth, Obama is bringing the terrorists to New York to make a mockery of the judicial system that he so despises! Why else give the full protection of the Constitution of the United States to a non American terrorist?

Fifth, Obama hopes that the trial will reveal to Al Qaida and numerous other terrorists the methods by which we gather our intelligence, conduct surveillance and perhaps even the identity of US intelligence agents.

Last and most important Obama is bringing Khalid Muhammad the terrorist who masterminded the 911 attacks to New York precisely becasue he knows that it will incite additional attacks causing the crisis that Rahm Emnuel so hopes for. The previous trial, the one after the first WTC bombing was nothing but a circus and  the result is that 911 followed. The number and magnitude of the attacks that will come in during and after this trial will rival 011 and perhaps surpass it.  This will lead to Obama declaring martial law and assuming dictatorial powers.

Hussein Obama is bringing Khalid Muhammed to new York to crown him prince and himself  king.

“His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world’s population,” the Nobel committee said in a news release.”

OK fine. Here then is the question. As far as I can tell  Obma has not as yet accomplished any single major policy change, on the contrary it can be argued he actually lost many of the advances made by George W Bush.  Can anyone tell us how exactly has Obama’s diplomacy differed form that of George W Bush . Let me rephrase that, please tell me how Obama  has improved US diplomacy, the failures we know.

America, he said, was bad
But  when he’ll fix it you’ll be glad
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama

He said that you pollute the air
and now must pay your fair share
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama

He said that we all got  health care
But  anyway he doesn’t care
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama

He said he knows that you are  white
and he will show you what is right
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama

He said he’ll prove that he’s the One
And all you own will soon be gone
Mmm, mmm, mm
Barack Hussein Obama

And when he’ll be all said and done
Will our country still go on?
Mmm mmm mm Barack Hussein

But if you disagree you see
You are a racist yessiree
Mmm Mmm Mmm Barack Hussein Obama

So we’ll now have the socialized  health care  and car reparation programs off the front page and instead the media will be getting all kinds of excitements running up and down their collective and individual legs at the picture of the returning Slick Willie.
Well, they shouldn’t count their chickens just yet after all its a long flight and the two girls are probably very grateful to ol’ Bill. I hope they’re not wearing blue.

In this he joins a growing chorus of administration economists who echo the same sentiments.

I agree and as it is evident this recession was nothing but run of the mill recession aggravated and manipulated by the forces, left wing and otherwise from the US, Middle East and Europe ,  and China, who had a direct interest in the election of Hussein Obama and the destruction our country.  My evidence is a simple as it is real. The banks returned the TARP funds and are posting record earnings, end of story!

Also yesterday Tim Geithner, the smartest man in the world who can’t figure out -or voluntarily pay – his taxes mentioned that once the recession is over the government will have to “pay down the deficit” and “make some though choices”. Understand please that when yentas like Geithner talk about the government making though choices they are talking about the difficulty that elected politicians will have explaining the further tax increase that await the middle class.  Yes you!

Now here is the how we fight back! Apparently and by Hussein Obama’s own admission only about 10% of the Stimuls funds have been distributed and probably only a fraction of that has been used. The rest of it is not due to be spent until  2010, coincidentally just prior the the election!

If as the Obamunists say the recession is over and we have to raise taxes, why not give the much maligned white middle class a break, not spend the stimulus plan to fund  ACORN activism . Tell Hussein Obama to give the damn money back!

Now in the interest of fairness and truth we really can’t compare Mrs.Pauline Coleman Gates with Obama’s biological mama. Considering that the latter was gallivanting from one armpit of the globe to another  being an international third world  slut while Obama grand-mama was raising “The Blessed One” we shall use her to compare the two mamas.

By all accounts and apperances, drugs and misdemeanors not withstanding, Obama grand-mama raised her son to be as he himself confesses , a respectful young black man”. He lived in her house ate her food wore cloths that she paid for and was raised by her as if she was her own son.
Well, that didn’t stop Obama from repeatedly throwing her under the bus, both verbally and in writing.  It didn’t prevent him from going to see her , by himself, when she was deathly ill “as soon as he could”  and it didn’t stop him from going to her funeral , also by himself. Isn’t that what a loving son should do?

Why did Oprah’s “The Blessed One” throw his grandma under the bus? If you recall, according to Hussein Obama,  Mrs. Madelyn Dunham, the Obama grand mama, ” once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe. “ That apparently  was enough for Obama to throw Mrs Madelyn Dunham under the bus on national television and equate her with the scum bag Rev. Wright.

It seems to me that Hussein Obama has some pretty thin skin when it comes to his grandma , after all he voluntarily ran to live with her instead of with his “proud African” father in Indonesia  so I find it puzzling that he turned on her and treated her in that manner. Its even more strident considering that he did this in a  particular speech which was meant to address his relationship with his spiritual mentor Wright. Be that as it may, Hussein Obama threw his grandma under the bus becasue he believed that she may have perhaps uttered what he considered  racial stereotypes.
In sharp contrast to the way Hussein Obama treated his grand mama cum mama,  is the way Henry Gates who is often refered to as “the nation’s most famous black scholar” views his own mother.

In his now infamous 1994  interview Gates said ” I mean, Malcom X was talking about the white man was the devil .. I glance over at Mama and her face was radiant. I mean, this smile — beatific smile started to transform her face. And she said quite quietly, “Amen.”

Could one say that Gates’ mama may have agreed with  racist stereotypes? ” Hmmmm you might rabbit you might.”

Gates continues telling us how his mother treated his white wife “And they had many confrontations, many bad — my mother used to do things like say, “I bet you hate black people, right”

Once again could one say that Gates’ mama uttered  stereotypes like Obama grand mama might have uttered?” Hmmmm you might rabbit you might.”

Finally here is Henry Gates telling us about his mama.

“LAMB: At one point you had a line in there, something to the effect, “My mother despised white people.”

GATES: My mother hated white people.

LAMB: All her life?

GATES: Probably”

OK so who are we to argue? Gate’s mother was a racist scum bag who hated whites. But you know what? Gates has yet to disavow his mother’s racism much less throw her under the bus the way Obama threw his mother.

The hatred and racism of Gate’s mother is not disguised it is  avowed  and witnessed to by Gate and by his good friend Barack Hussein Obama! Has Hussein Obama denounced his friend’s mother’s racism? Sure immediately after he denounced Wright’s another words never. Has he denounced his friend Henry Gates for not following his own example and denounce his mother’s racism? Of course not.
So the question that lingers is “why not?” Why did Hussein Obama so dishonor his mother a trailblazing woman, the fist woman to be promoted Bank Vice President in Hawaii, for what any reasonable person can only deduce to be at best imaginary slights?

Why does Henry gates do the opposite and idolize and adore a woman who he himself unequivocally admits to hating whites?

Could it be because the two are black and one of the women is white?

Now the two cannot be both right. I understand that Gates loves his mother, but then what does Hussein Obama, by throwing his own mother under the bus for imaginary reasons, show us about his psychological state?
Many have alleged that Obama is showing visible psychopathic  tendencies. If Hussein Obama is not capable of loving the one white woman who took care of him and raised him what does that say about Obama’s view of all other whites?