Read Time: 6 min

The Brown Shirts have become , and rightfully so, one of history’s most succinct expressions for modern era dictatorial brutality, anti democratic subversion and political intimidation.

The image of Hitler’s Brown Shirted battalions of thugs marching trough Berlin and intimidating, beating and killing political rivals are, or should be,  etched in the  universal consciousness of every living person.

What has however remained  hidden form the worldwide consciousness  is that the Brown Shirt’s legacy is in fact the legacy of  a left wing , socialist , anti Christian,  homosexual organization – and this omission is of course by design. Just do a search for   “Night of the Long Knives”  and see how many sites pop up that will even mention, except maybe in passing, that the SA’s  (the Brown Shirts) high command, including its leader Earnst Rohm  were  homosexuals… No that fact has to be kept hidden from the public because the evil in this world is created not by blacks or minorities or homosexuals but by conservative white heterosexual Christians don’t you know.

You heard said  that history repeats itself but how often did you believe it? More importantly how often did you actually see it happen? Well, it’s happening now. The new Brown Shirts live not in Germany but in the current bastion of socialist hatred, California. The new Brown Shirts are not street brawlers, not yet , but they are just as dangerous to innocent citizens who do nothing but exercise their constitutional rights!

Like then , the current Neo-Brown Shirts show complete disdain for the will of the people who voted in a lawful election.  That matters not to them, the only thing that matters to them is that they push their agenda down your throats. Their current issue is “gay marriage” but worry not, becasue if that ever becomes the law of the land they will find something else. I don’t know what but it could be that they might just want you pay some sort of reparations or even undergo treatment to cure your “heterosexuality”. After all but for your reproductive functions the earth would still be pristine would it not you homocentric heterosexual  polluter you.

Back to the subject. Its no coincidence that now, like then the socialists- Hitler then, the likes of Nancy Pelosi now- are using homosexuals to attack society and democracy! The rapid demise  of the Weimarcht republic was brought about using the homosexual Brown Shirts as shock troops and they are being used again for the same purpose. The difference is that this war is not one of street battles, like I said , not yet anyway, but it’s more of a cultural war, a war of misinformation and intimidation and  destruction of our societal values. Once again homosexuals are at the forefront of this destruction as they were in Germany and no it isn’t the first time that they attacked out institutions.  It doesn’t matter that thee homosexuals who infiltrated the Catholic church were not organized or centralized the effects were the same as if they had been sent out with specific instructions from the Comintern. The young children whose lives were permanently mutilated by the pedophile homosexuals were then used by other arms of the socialist hydra to attempt to destroy the Catholic Church. But wait, don’t you dare call them homosexuals they were only pedophiles who ahhh…only liked boys.  Fresh of that shameful episode – to them in fact a joyous victory- the homosexual community set it’s sites on the Boy Scouts seeking to destroy yet another of our most cherished institutions. Fortunately the Boy Scouts stood firm and the country rallied around them and we were able to stave off , at least for now, the homosexual  infection of the Boy Scouts.

Below is a courageous article by Rick Santorum in which he describes how the “neo-brown shirts” – my words not his- intimidate and attempt to humiliate Californians who voted for the natural God given institution of marriage. That they are able to do this is as much our fault as anyone’s. We as a society chose to look the other way and even accept the perversion and aberration that is homosexuality now we reap the results of our weakness.

The Elephant in the Room: No way to preach tolerance

Opponents of same- sex marriage have faced persecution in California.

By Rick Santorum

Kids need a mom and a dad. Californians who think the state’s marriage law should reflect this deeply held belief were forced to appeal directly to the people, with a 2008 referendum to overturn a state Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage. Proposition 8, an amendment to the state constitution defining marriage as being between one man and one woman, passed easily.

The reaction of some Prop 8 opponents – the self-proclaimed champions of tolerance – was swift and fierce. They moved to harass and persecute Prop 8 supporters.

Groups such as the misnamed “Californians Against Hate” published blacklists of Prop 8 backers that included supporters’ names and addresses. Prop 8 advocates became the target of harassing protests, phone calls, e-mails, and mailings.

A flier distributed in one town featured a photo of one Prop 8 backer, his name, the amount of his donation, and the name of his (Catholic) church. Next to his photo was the word “Bigot.”

Some Prop 8 campaign donors had to resign from their jobs or take leaves of absence to protect their employers and colleagues. Top officials of California Musical Theatre and the Los Angeles Film Festival were forced to resign just because they had donated in support of Prop 8.

That wasn’t all. These warriors for the oppressed also made a point of going after pro-Prop 8 Mormons and their church.

While this ugliness was exploding across California, the anti-Prop 8 forces also ran to the state courts to overturn the people’s will. They claimed – get this – that the amendment to the state constitution violated the state constitution.

But not even a state Supreme Court with a habit of rewriting the constitution would accept this illogical absurdity. It upheld Prop 8.

If the reliably progressive activists on the state Supreme Court couldn’t be counted on, where to go? How about going before a sympathetic federal district court judge in San Francisco to challenge Prop 8 as violating the U.S. Constitution?

Federal Judge Vaughn Walker has accepted the Prop 8 opponents’ assertion that constitutionality hinges on the attitudes of voters, not legal arguments and precedents. So he has consistently ruled in their favor, turning this trial into another instance of harassment of Prop 8 supporters.

Consider Walker’s precedent-breaking rulings in the trial, which began last month:

He decided that Prop 8 proponents should be subjected to questioning about their personal beliefs on marriage and sexuality.

He ordered Prop 8 proponents to disclose private communications about never-used campaign messages.

He directed the Prop 8 campaign to turn over copies of all internal records and e-mail messages on campaign strategy.

He refused not only to demand any of these things of the proposition’s opponents, but also to so much as rule on a motion related to that issue.

He subjected one proponent to humiliation for his concerns about homosexuality, as written in private e-mails to friends – in Chinese.

He allowed witnesses for opponents of the proposition to air their “expert” opinions that homosexuals have been discriminated against, that they feel bad when society does not validate their relationships, and that the passage of Prop 8 echoed historical bigotry foisted on society by religious zealots.

He even allowed one witness to testify that his parents tried to change his sexual orientation. The witness was a gay Colorado man who had never lived in California or been exposed to any Proposition 8 campaign messages.

In light of the campaign of harassment and intimidation of Prop 8 proponents, Walker’s most contemptible ruling would have had this show trial broadcast worldwide. The U.S. Supreme Court found he probably violated court rules in his attempt to take part in a “pilot project” allowing cameras in the courtroom.

The Supreme Court blocked the effort, but by then Prop 8 supporters had lost two-thirds of their expert witnesses, who feared they would be harassed and blacklisted.

California’s voters have spoken. The only point of Walker’s rigged trial is to convince appellate courts that voters who passed Proposition 8 are intolerant bigots. But an honest look at the behavior of both sides over the past year tells a very different story.

The massive relief effort to help the Haitians has been undertaken largely by whites,  Hispanics from South American countries, Israel, and there was even assistance form one Arab country, Jordan.

Where was the assistance form the African countries? Where is the assistance form the black community in America?

Al Sharpton can manufacture racist charges out of whole cloth, as he usually does , and exponentially more blacks will show at that rally  then showed up to assist the Haitian community. Come to think of it I saw not a single rally from the black community to assist Haiti. Not a single concert for charity or million man march or anything . Heck even a rap  concert and subsequent inevitable riot and looting would have been something . Alas, nada!

The news outlets ran story after story of white couples and church groups going to Haiti to help out or to even adopt children but I really saw no blacks have doing  that?

How many black churches have organized such efforts? I sure didn’t see any and if there are one or two there sure as heck weren’t and aren’t enough.

The tragedy in Haiti gave the world a chance to show shine and most did . The black community in America and the world over  did not , on the contrary it covered itself with shame.

CBS/AP) Two U.S. helicopters dropped elite Marine recon teams behind Taliban lines before dawn Friday as the U.S.-led force stepped up operations to break resistance on the seventh day of fighting in the besieged militant stronghold of Marjah.

About two dozen Marines were inserted into an area where skilled Taliban marksmen are known to operate, an officer said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of security concerns.

U.S. and Afghan troops encountered skilled sharpshooters and better-fortified Taliban positions Thursday, indicating that insurgent resistance in their logistics and opium-smuggling centre was far from crushed. (source)

Read time 3.5 min.

No sooner did Scott Brown win the election that Mike Savage led the chorus of Scott Brown for president. Referring to Sarah Palin, Savage said, and I’ll paraphrase here  but I am sure that I’m very close to an exact quote, I hope she’s not the nominee but some new guy like  or Scott Brown..

Savage found out that Brown will endorse the Obama “stealing white’s money to redistribute to minorities” plan aka “the jobs stimulus plan” and suddenly he starts bashing those that fantasized about what kind of  president Brown would make.

Well, well, well, hey Scavenge in case you forgot, you were foremost among them!

Now, like you I pay no mind to the food processor ahhh I mean the food PhD except to maybe laugh at the childish one liners that he desperately tries to pass as artistic inspiration. One such example, and one that I find more humorous the more I think about is  this brain fart, “‘when you hear Coltrane you hear a soul scream”  I kid you not he says things like that and repeats them in a sort of self revelation of his own artistic attributes..Yeah I know.

Anyway for him to now come out and bash the fools who thought Scott Brown would be a presidential candidate is the most despicable display of hypocrisy that I have seen come out of the Scavenge sewer in a long time. The hypocrisy doesn’t stop there but it does in fact permeate this entire miserable little creature. No sooner did he finish  bashing  Brown supporters that he endorsed Mitt Romney for president! Ha?

Is that supposed to be some kind of a joke?  Mike Scavenge thinks that you are stupid, hell  he tells you that every single day, so he might think that we’ll let him get away with this but enough is enough! I have to call a shill a shill and Scavenge is a shill.

We all know that Romney is the nuveau neo-con par-exellance so there is no need for me to reiterate Romeny’s platform except maybe to mention that the  health care plan he implemented in Massachusetts is bankrupt and is bankrupting the state. I will also mention that Romney is somewhat of a late comer to the Pro-Life Movement and his commitment to our sacred Second Amendment is sketchy at best.

On the second amendment  please not that in 2004 Romney signed a bill that permanently banned so called “assault weapons” in Massachusetts – as if anyone but maybe a dozen or so people  in Massachusetts actually had real assault weapons. ( here is an article on that from National Review)

On Abortion Romney’s record is even sketchier and here is how he answered the National Abortion Rights Action League, or NARAL (now called NARAL Pro-Choice America) questionnaire:

“I respect and will protect a woman’s right to choose. This choice is a deeply personal one. Women should be free to choose based on their own beliefs, not mine and not the government’s. The truth is no candidate in the governor’s race in either party would deny women abortion rights. So let’s end an argument that does not exist and stop these cynical and divisive attacks that are made only for political gain” See full details on this at The Weekly Standard

That Mike Savage would prefer this individual over Sarah Palin a person whose conservative credentials are head and shoulders over those of Mitt Romney is not easily explained. Stranger still is Mike Scavenger’s , ahhh I mean Mike Savage’s full endorsement de jour of Michelle Buchman.

It’s also worth noting that Mike Scavenge did endorse  John McCalim in the national election before denouncing him after he lost. I wonder why it’s OK for Mike Savage to do that but it’s unforgivable for Scott Brown supporters to do the same  and unlike Scavange’s candidate, actually win in one of the most liberal states in the nation?

Citing the later’s  teleprompter reading of a WWII story involving chaplains and a rabbi -betraying his training  as a food critic Scavenge called the individual a “Jewish Rabbi”  so as not to be confused with the other rabbi the Druid One- Scavange wholeheartedly endorsed her for “vice president”. No I have no idea why he didn’t endorse her for the presidential spot I guess Scavenge doesn’t think a woman is ready for that post just yet.  His justification was that Michelle ” can speak unlike Sarah Palin who only uses talking points.”

He says this about a woman who delivered the most rousing speech of the previous Presidential campaign with just a few notes scribbled on an index card? Are you kidding me? Comparing Palin’s character and intellect to that of Michael Savage is akin to comparing Savage’s intellect, though not his character to that of his mingy pet poodle – I think that the poodle might win the character battle but not by much, after all the two have been sleeping together.

Why is Mike Savage so afraid of Palin?  For the same reason that the neocons and the libs and the libertarians  are afraid of her!

You can take a guess but let me assure you it has everything to do with her Christian populism

Update 2.20.10, FOX caught up with and is echoing Conundergound.com by reporting on the the hypocrisy I wrote about yesterday.. Better late than,well, you know!

On February 17, two days ago we were told that the US had captured terrorist leader “Abdul Ghani Baradar, the No. 2 behind Afghan Taliban founder Mohammad Omar and a close associate of Osama bin Laden”
We don’t know when he was captured, we have to assume that it was done at least a few days earlier. (For some unknown reason we are told that he is singing like a cannery, shouldn’t that information be a closely guarded secret?)  In fact we just learned that yet another terrorist leader,Mullah Salam, was captured soon after Abdul Baradar was in custody and probably due to intelligence provided by the latter.

Why does Obama think that Americans are so much weaker than Pokeesthanis?

I have a simple question for Obama, “Was Abdul Gahni Baradar” Mirandaized fifty minutes after his capture?  If not why not?

We were told by the fascist left that unless we treat Iraqi terrorists as if they were American DWI suspects we would be creating more terrorists in Iraq and all over the world.

We are told by the fascist left that unless we afford terrorists the same rights that we have in America we will become just like the terrorists.

We are told by the fascist left that if we don’t immediately  Mirandize them and provide them  ACLU lawyers we run the risk of miraculously turning into terrorists.

OK but don’t the Pokeesthanis run the same risk? Why does Obama think that Americans are so much weaker than Pokeesthanis? Surely Pokkesthan is at a higher risk of turning into a terrorist nation then we in the US are !

So why does Obama say that unless we Mirandaize terrorists we Americans run the chance of becoming like the terrorists but the Pokeesthanis  are immune to the same?

As inspired by twitts from  @dontlikeitleave